BASIC EMOTIONS IN THE 2008 US PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES: WHAT AND HOW

Authors

  • Yusrita Yanti Universitas Bung Hatta

Keywords:

Basic emotion, Cognitive appraisal study, Figurative language, Function, Value

Abstract

The present study investigates the basic emotions in the 2008 US Presidential Debates. Basic emotions refer to the emotional state or the strong feeling that is revealed through word use. In the presidential debates, each candidate conveyed ideas, information, and criticisms, and they also proposed a number of programs in the debates. In the delivery of the ideas, emotions accompany the speakers’ opinions. The emotions of the candidates were depicted in the words used. Such emotions can be a reflection of personal, group, and/or societal emotions as a result of an evaluation of social phenomena, situations, and conditions faced by people in society. Data used in this study were taken from three transcripts of the presidential debates between Democratic candidate Barrack Obama and his Republican opponent John McCain. All data were classified in terms of literal and non-literal expressions and analyzed comprehensively by using cognitive appraisal theory and other related theories that can be expanded in terms of basic emotion framework, function, value, and politeness framework. From the data analysis, the various emotions were verbalized through literal words or using vocabulary for emotion, figurative languages such as metaphor, personification, and irony/sarcasm; repetition of the same words, phrases, clauses/lexical bundles; and rhetorical questions. These words show how the expression of emotions reflects the function and values. This study is useful for improving communication skills to construct a polite, dynamic, and colorful speech.

References

Bamberg, M. (1997). The Role of Language in the Construction of Emotion. Journal Language Sciences, 19(4).

Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical Bundles in University Spoken and Written Registers. English for Specific Purposes, 2(6), 263–286.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cambridge Dictionaries Online: The most popular online dictionary and thesaurus for learners of English. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2012, from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/

Crabtree, M., & Power, J. (1991). Language Files: Materials for an introduction to language. Colombus: Ohio State University Press.

Ekman, P. (1999). Basic Emotions. In T. D. Power (Ed.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion.

Elliott, C. (1992). The Affective Reasoner: A Process Model of Emotions in a Multi-Agent System. Illinois: Northwestern University.

Fiehler, R. (2002). How to do emotions with words: Emotionality in conversation. In The verbal communication of emotions: an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 79–106). New Jersey: LEA.

Funch, F. (n.d.). Transformational Paths. Retrieved from http://www.worldtrans.org/TP/TP2/TP2ATOP.HTML

Kaneko, T. (2003). How non-native speakers express anger, surprise, anxiety and grief: a corpus-based comparative study. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2003 Conference, 16, 384–394. Retrieved from http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/publications/CL2003/papers/kaneko.pdf.

Kovecses, Z. (2002). Emotion Concepts: Social Constructionism and Cognitive Linguistic. In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The Verbal Communication of Emotions: Interdiciplinary Perspective. New Jersey: LEA.

Krzywinski, M. (2008). Lexical Analysis of 2008 US Presidential and Vice Presidential Debates-Who’s the Windbag? Retrieved from http://mkweb.bcgsc.ca/debates

Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. H. & N. Quinn (Ed.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leech, G. (1983). The Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.

Lucas, S. (2009). The Art of Public Speaking. Boston: Mac Graw Hill.

Parrot, W. (2001). Emotion in Social Psychology: Essential Reading. New York: Psychology Press.

Pennebaker, J. W. (2008a). Debates 3: McCain and Obama word usage. Retrieved from Wordwatchers website: http://wordwatchers.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/debates-3-mccain-and-obama-word- usage/

Pennebaker, J. W. (2008b). Debates Language. Retrieved from Wordwatchers website: http://word-watchers.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/debates-language

Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion: Theory, Research, and Experience. Theories of Emotion.

Post, M. D. (2009). Representations of Meaning within Textual Personas: An Analysis of 2008 US Presidential Campaign Speeches. 143. Retrieved from http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-artslaw/cels/essays/appliedlinguistics/RepresentationsofMeaning-DissertationMPost.pdf

Richards, J., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1985). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.

Santangelo, P. (2009). Reconstructing the Fragments of Emotions: Textual analysis for a Research of The Representation of States of Mind in East Asia (N. Pawlak, Ed.). Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Universitytetu Warszawskiego.

Savoy, J. (2008). Lexical Analysis of Obama’s and McCain’s Speeches. Retrieved from http://members.unine.ch/Jacques.savoy/papers/USspeeches.pdf.

Strongman, K. T. (2003). The Psychology of Emotion: From Everyday Life to Theory. England: John Wiley & Sons.

Transcript of the First McCain-Obama Presidential Debates The University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F.

Transcript of the Second McCain, Obama debate. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/.

Transcript of the Third McCain, Obama debate. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/10/debates.

Wang, J. (2010). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama’s Speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.254-261

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30