EICHMANN IS IN THE PANOPTICON: COMMENTS ON HANNAH ARENDT’S “BANALITY OF EVIL”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37301/culingua.v2i3.91Keywords:
Arendt, Eichmann, banality of evil, panopticonAbstract
Hannah Arendt’s book “Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil” has led to a hot-debated argument among readers for years, in particular, the Jews. She has been criticized for describing the former Nazi officer, Adolf Eichmann, with the terms “thoughtless”, “clown”, and “banal”. However, through a close reading of the expression “banality of evil,” this paper presents the rational side of what Arendt has written about the offender, who has been responsible for murdering millions of people in the extermination camps. Many see him as guilty and extremely sinful. While others consider him as a heedless follower of fascism. This study aims to explore the invisible parts of this case – through the Jewish gazes on Eichmann during his trial which show the power relation that is depicted in Foucault’s “panopticism”, the influence of nationalism (Immanuel Kant), Ideology (Gramsci and Althusser), and obedience (Milgram’s experiment). This analysis demonstrates that Arendt has turned to philosophy and depicted Eichmann in his state of nature rather than being a German or a Nazi officer.
References
Althusser, L. (2011). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism (pp. 1483–1509). New York: W. W. Norton.
Arendt, H. (2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem: a report on the banality of evil. New York: Penguin Classics.
Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.
Berenbaum, M. (2020). Adolf Eichmann. Retrieved April 6, 2020, from Encyclopedia Britannica website: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Adolf-Eichmann
Butler, J. (2011). Hannah Arendt’s challenge to Adolf Eichmann. Retrieved from The Guardian website: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/hannah-arendt-adolf-eichmann-banality-of-evil%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/B0FA10A0-5DFE-417B-BD05-31642876C259
Dossa, S. (1984). Hannah Arendt on Eichmann: The Public, the Private and Evil. The Review of Politics, 163–182.
Dresser, S. (2018). What did Hannah Arendt really mean by the banality of evil? Retrieved from aeon website: https://aeon.co/ideas/what-did-hannah-arendt-really-mean-by-the-banality-of-evil
Eckman, B. (1977). Research: Stanely Milgram’s “Obedience” Studies. A Review of General Semantics, 88–99.
Eichmann Trial. (n.d.). Retrieved July 10, 2021, from Holocaust Encyclopedia website: https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/eichmann-trial
Feinberg, A. (1986). The Appeal of the Executive: Adolf Eichmann on the Stage. Monatshefte, 203–214.
Fenigstein, A. (2015). Milgram’s Shocks Experiminets and the Nazi Perpetrators: contrarian perspective on the role of obedience pressure during the Holocaust. Theory and Psychology, 581–598.
Foucault, M. (1977). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Gottlieb, S. (2011). Beyond Tragedy: Arendt, Rogat, and the Judges in Jerusalem. College Literature, 45–56.
Grafton, A. (2020). Arendt and Eichmann at the Dinner Table. The American Scholar, 105–119.
Halberstam, J. (1988). From Kant to Auschwitz. Social Theory and Practice, 41–54.
Hannah Arendt’s angst was born in the US, says author. (n.d.). Retrieved July 10, 2021, from The Times of Israel website: https://www.timesofisrael.com/hannah-arendts-angst-was-born-in-the-usa-says-author/
History.com. (2020, 4 20). Retrieved from The Holocaust: https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/the-holocaust. Accessed 14-07-2021.
Hobsbawm, E. (2000). The Antonio Gramsci Reader: Selected writings, 1916–1935 (D. Forgacs, Ed.). New York: New York University Pres.
Jackson, S. J. (2018). Eichmann the Kantian? Retrieved from DET website: http://derevth.blogspot.com/2014/09/eichmann-kantian.html
Jerusalem trial of Adolf Eichmann Trial in 1961. (n.d.). Retrieved from Willzuzak website: https://willzuzak.ca/lp/eichma02.html. Accessed 15-06-2021
Ophir, A. (1996). Between Eichmann and Kant: Thinking on Evil after Arendt. History and Memory, 89–136.
Smith, G. H. (2016). Immanuel Kant and Nazism. Retrieved from Libertanianism.org website: https://www.libertarianism.org/columns/immanuel-kant-nazism
Steinberger, P. (1990). Hannah Arendt on Judgment. American Journal of Political Science, 803–821.
Schwitzgebel, E. (2007). Human Nature and Moral Education in Mencius, Xunzi, Hobbes, and Rousseau. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 147-168.
The wiener Holocaust library. (n.d.). Retrieved July 20, 2021, from The Holocaust Explained website: https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-camps/types-of-camps/extermination-camps/
Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan: Summary, Quotes & Analysis. (n.d.). Retrieved July 1, 2021, from Study.com website: https://study.com/academy/lesson/thomas-hobbes-leviathan-summary-quotes-analysis.html
Varden, H. (2010). Kant and Lying to the Murderer at the Door. One More Time: Kant’s Legal Philosophy and Lies to Murderers and Nazis. Social Philosophy, 403–421.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Shajwan Nariman Fatah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
