IMPLICATURE IN THE INTERNET MEMES: SEMIO-PRAGMATICS ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Nova Rina Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Yusrita Yanti Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Hayqal Idham Universitas Bung Hatta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37301/culingua.v1i1.7

Keywords:

implicature, context, internet meme, function

Abstract

Internet memes refer to memes that are spread through the Internet, from person to person via social networks, blogs, direct email, or news sources. The main purpose of internet memes are for humorous or to entertain the readers. However, not all people can easily interpret a meme. This phenomenon appears to be the case because several internet memes contain implied meaning or implicature due to the limited caption available and the picture it brings which has its own character and representation. The purpose of this research is to describe the implicature in the internet memes by using Grice's theory in the perspective semiotics and pragmatics due to all of contexts, symbol, icon, and index in the memes influence the interpretation of the implied meaning and the intention. In this analysis, the writers uses qualitative method. The data were taken from the three meme websites: 9gag.com, knowyourmeme.com and memecenter.com. The data collected have been completely analyzed based on the research questions. The results show the most dominant memes spread of using conventional implicature. There are six categories found based on its idea and representation; they are (1) masculinity, (2) personal experience, (3) loneliness, (4) social events, (5) false analogy and (6) sarcasm. Then, there are at least two contexts that influence the implication of each meme, and the most dominant influence is the social contexts.

References

gag.com. (n.d.). Retrieved June 2016, from 9GAG website: http://9gag.com/

Crabtree, M., & Power, J. (1991). Language Files: Materials for an introduction to language. Colombus: Ohio State University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Approaches (3rd Edition). In Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. https://doi.org/10.2307/1523157

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse. In Pragmatics and Discourse. London: Routledge.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Speech Acts. Berkeley: University of California.

Hoed, B. H. (2011). Semiotik dan Dinamika Sosial Budaya. Depok: Komunitas Bambu.

Kariko, A. A. T. (2016). Analysis on internet memes using semiotics (Binus Universit). Binus Universit. Retrieved from https://english.binus.ac.id/2013/06/24/analysis-on-internet-memes-using-semiotics/

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meme Center. (2013). No Title. Retrieved from Meme Center website: http://www.memecenter.com/top/daily

Moleong, L. J. (2006). Metedologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Putra, R. A., & Triyono, S. (2018). The Diversity of Internet Memes Interpretations: A Discourse Analysis of Incongruity of Popular Memes Made by Indonesian Netizen. PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education, 6(2), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v6i2.49-61

Schubert, K. (2003). Bazaar Goes Bizarre. Retrieved from USA Today website: http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/news/2003-07-28-ebay-weirdness_x.htm

Strauss, S., & Feiz, P. (2014). Discourse analysis: Putting our worlds into words. In Discourse Analysis: Putting our Worlds into Words. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203121559

Yanti, Y., & Fitri, R. P. (2018). Pragmatic study of irony in the political cartoons of donald trump. Journal of Social Sciences Research, (Specialissue2), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi2.554.564

Downloads

Published

2020-09-28

Issue

Section

Articles