COMBINING FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION AND ONLINE LEARNING IN A YOUNG LEARNER EFL SPEAKING CLASSROOMS

Authors

  • Elfiondri Universitas Bung Hatta
  • Faisal Mustafa Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
  • Siti Sarah Fitriani Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
  • Wiwiek Pratiwi Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
  • Puspawati

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Hybrid Learning, Online Learning, EFL Speaking

Abstract

This study was aimed at finding out whether the implementation of blended learning by combining face-to-face interaction and online learning simultaneously in a young learner EFL speaking classroom could significantly improve their speaking proficiency. The data were collected by administering a monologue speaking test before and after the treatment by using this type of blended learning. The pretest and post-test scores were compared statistically using Wilcoxon’s Matched Pairs Signed Rank Test, which is a non-parametric significance test, because the data were not normally distributed based on the Shapiro Wilk test, even after data transformation attempts. In addition, the effect sizes were calculated by using a statistic analogous to the r used in the Mann–Whitney Test. The analysis results showed that the overall speaking proficiency significantly improved (p-value = 0.000). When speaking skills were analyzed individually, the p-value for all speaking skills showed significant evidence of improvement. The effect sizes were large except for the vocabulary component. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the implementation of blended learning by combining face-to-face interaction and online learning simultaneously in a young learner EFL speaking classroom could significantly improve the students’ speaking proficiency. Therefore, it is recommended that teachers apply this blended learning model to promote speaking skill practice in an EFL language classroom.

References

Akyol, T. (2013). A study on identifying pronunciation learning strategies of Turkish EFL learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1456–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.01.211

Allen, I. E., & Seman, J. (2003). Maximizing the opportunity: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002 and 2003. Needham: Sloan-C.

Atli, I., & Bergil, A. S. (2012). The effect of pronunciation instruction on students’ overall speaking skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3665–3671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.124

Aziz, E., Kasim, U., Mustafa, F., & Putra, T. M. (2019). Reading comprehension in the TOEFL PBT: Which sub-skill deserves more intensive training? TESOL International Journal.

Baser, C., & Kanar, M. N. (2014). How can you “gift” to second language young learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 246–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.322

Biaylstok, E. (1997). The structure of age: in search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13(2), 116–137.

Boelens, R., Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2018). The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning. Computers and Education, 120(February), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.009

Boo, Z., Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005–2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2015.10.006

Brown, D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Longman.

Celik, O., & Yavuz, F. (2015). The relationship between speaking grades and listening grades of university level preparatory students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2137–2140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.339

Cerezo, R., Calderón, V., & Romero, C. (2019). A holographic mobile-based application for practicing pronunciation of basic English vocabulary for Spanish speaking children. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 124, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHCS.2018.11.009

Çimenli, B. (2015). On pronunciation teaching and semiotics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 634–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.590

Copland, F., & Ni, M. (2019). Languages in the young learner classroom. In S. Garton & F. Copland (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners (pp. 138–153). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Demircio?lu, ?. (2010). Teaching English vocabulary to young learners via drama. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 439–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.039

Djiwandono, P. I. (2013). A Blended Learning Approach to Enhance College Students’ Vocabulary Learning. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(2), 210–220. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=95059014&site=ehost-live

Elfiondri. (2018). Teaching Spoken English to EFL Learners using “Finding Nemo” Movie. Asian EFL Journal Vol 20, Issue 2. 2018.

Ekin, M. T. Y., & Damar, E. A. (2013). Voices from the young learner classrooms: If I were …. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 602–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.246

Friedmann, N., & Rusou, D. (2015). Critical period for first language: the crucial role of language input during the first year of life. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 35, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONB.2015.06.003

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Hadfield, J., & Hadfield, C. (2008). Introduction to teaching English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harris, D. P. (1969). Testing English as a second language. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. Retrieved from Library of Congress Catalog

Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 177, 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COGNITION.2018.04.007

Heaton, J. B. (1990). Writing English language tests. London: Longman Group. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/003368827600700219

Herron, C., York, H., Corrie, C., & Cole, S. P. (2006). A comparison study of the effects of a story-based video instructional package versus a text-based instructional package in the intermediate-level foreign language classroom. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i2.281-307

Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of language: The status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition, 39(3), 215–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90054-8

Kim, S. J. (2004). Coping with cultural obstacles to speaking English in the Korean secondary school context. Asian EFL Journal, 6(3), 17–27. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/1395/quarterly-journal/2012/01/coping-with-cultural-obstacles-to-speaking-english-in-the-korean-secondary-school-context/#squelch-taas-tab-content-0-3

K?rkgöz, Y. (2011). A blended learning study on implementing video recorded speaking tasks in task-based classroom instruction. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v10i4/1041.pdf

Klentien, U., & Wannasawade, W. (2016). Development of blended learning model with virtual science laboratory for secondary students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2016.02.126

Lackman, K. (2010). Teaching speaking sub-skills: Activities for improving speaking. Toronto: Ken Lackman & Associates Educational Consultans.

Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Laurén & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special Language: From Humans to Thinking Machines (pp. 316–323). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Laufer, B., & Shmueli, K. (1997). Memorizing new words: Does teaching have anything to do with it? RELC Journal, 28(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829702800106

León Meis, M. (2000). Spanish-speaking EFL teachers: their needs, challenges, and advantages when teaching English pronunciation. Speak Out!, 26, 20–29.

Lin, H.-Y., Hung, M., & Wang, H.-J. (2016). The critical period hypothesis revisited: An investigation of Taiwanese university EFL learners’ roduction of two English consonants. Arab World English Journal, 7(2), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no2.28

Macaro, E., & Lee, J. H. (2013). Teacher language background, codeswitching, and English-only instruction: Does age make a difference to learners’ attitudes? TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 717–742. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.74

Mangiafico, S. S. (2016). Summary and analysis of extension program evaluation in R. New Jersey: Rutgers Cooperative Extensions.

Megawati, M., Mustafa, F., & Bahri Ys, S. (2016). Listening to real English: How much do EFL students in Indonesia understand a native speaker’s spoken language? In Current Trends in Languages and Education (pp. 350–353). Banda Aceh.

Michel, M., Kormos, J., Brunfaut, T., & Ratajczak, M. (2019). The role of working memory in young second language learners’ written performances. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSLW.2019.03.002

Mustafa, F. (2018). How much do high schools contribute to improving students’ English proficiency? Seeking alumni’s perception in Indonesia. Asian EFL Journal, 20(2), 49–61.

Mustafa, F. (2019). English vocabulary size of Indonesian high school graduates: Curriculum expectation and reality. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 357–371. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v3i2.278

Muthalib, K. A., Bahri Ys, S., & Mustafa, F. (2019). Why are you different? Investigating reasons of success by high achieving EFL students. Asian EFL Journal, 21(2), 166–182.

Nation, P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59

Nayak, B. K., & Hazra, A. (2011). How to choose the right statistical test? Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 59(2), 85–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.77005

Patel, D. M. F., & Jain, P. M. (2008). English language teaching. Jaipur: Sunrise Publishers & Distributors.

Privitera, G. J. (2018). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (3rd Ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage Production.

Rahayu, A. J. (2013). Improving students’ vocabulary through magic english video watching (A classroom action research at the fourth grade of SD AL-FATH Cirendeu). Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta.

Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and researching listening (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Roth, G., & Wright, A. (2000). Review: Teaching English to Young Learners. ELT Journal, 54(April). Retrieved from http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/

Sariçoban, A., & Kuç, A. (2010). Teaching problematic consonants in English to young learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 943–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.131

Segalowitz, N. (2016). Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9991

Shih, R.-C. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as a second language students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1048

?imon, S., Kilyeni, A., & Suciu, L. (2015). Strategies for improving the English pronunciation of the 1st year “Translation-interpreting” students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2157–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.04.222

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047

So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers and Education, 51(1), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009

Soekartawi. (2006). Blended e-learning: Alternatif model pembelajaran jarak jauh di Indonesia [Blended e-learning: An alternative distant learning model in Indonesia]. In Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi (SNATI). Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/Snati/article/view/1461

Stakanova, E., & Tolstikhina, E. (2014). Different Approaches to Teaching English as a Foreign Language to Young Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 146, 456–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.154

Stipek, D., Feiler, R., Daniels, D., & Milburn, S. (1995). Effects of different instructional approaches on young children’s achievement and motivation. Child Development, 66(1), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00866.x

Swaffar, J., & Vlatten, A. (1997). A sequential model for video viewing in the foreign language curriculum. The Modern Language Journal, 81(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb01173.x

Tarchi, C. (2015). Fostering reading comprehension of expository texts through the activation of readers’ prior knowledge and inference-making skills. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.013

Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: How to integrate online and traditional learning. London: Kogan Page Limited. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike09-20&path=ASIN/0749439017

Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabulary enhancement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 641–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.592

Turgut, Y., & Irgin, P. (2009). Young learners’ language learning via computer games. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 760–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.135

White, L., & Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12(3), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200301

Downloads

Published

2022-06-26

Issue

Section

Articles